The History of Qazi Courts in Turkestan
PDF

Keywords

Qazi courts; Turkestan; Islamic law; Sharia; Hanafi jurisprudence; legal pluralism; colonial administration; Tsarist Empire; Movarounnahr; Central Asia; waqf; fiqh; customary law (adat); Islamic governance; judicial reform

How to Cite

S. Karimov, K. (2025). The History of Qazi Courts in Turkestan. Advances in Science and Sustainability, 1(8), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.70728/susta.v01.i08.008

Abstract

 The history of Qazi courts in Turkestan reflects the long-standing continuity of Islamic judicial traditions within the changing socio-political landscape of Central Asia. Functioning under the Kokand and Bukhara Khanates, the Qazi courts served as the main institutions of justice, administration, and moral governance, operating on the basis of Sharia law and Hanafi jurisprudence. With the expansion of the Russian Empire into the region during the nineteenth century, the Qazi courts underwent a significant transformation: their jurisdiction was restricted mainly to family, inheritance, and waqf-related matters, while their autonomy was gradually curtailed under imperial supervision. Despite these reforms, the courts remained vital to local governance, maintaining legitimacy through their role in adjudicating disputes, authenticating documents, and preserving community cohesion. Drawing on archival sources, legal manuscripts, and historical scholarship, this study examines the structural evolution, functions, and adaptation of Qazi courts from the pre-colonial period to Tsarist rule. The findings reveal a dynamic process of legal pluralism in which Islamic law coexisted with Russian imperial legislation, producing a hybrid system of governance. The endurance of the Qazi institution underscores the resilience of Islamic jurisprudence and its capacity to balance religious tradition with political transformation.

PDF

References

https://academic.oup.com/book/5431/chapter/148289595

https://journals.openedition.org/asiecentrale/1293

https://webofjournals.com/index.php/9/article/download/

https://historical-science.com/index.php/journal/article/

https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/2015182

https://scholarexpress.net/index.php/wbml/article/download/

https://gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/2216/2129

https://ljcp.gov.pk/SiteImage/Publication/3.pdf

https://ijsshr.in/v5i12/Doc/45.pdf

https://clp.thebestwebshop.org/system/commissionon-legal

https://journals.openedition.org/asiecentrale/1293

https://www.academia.edu/372884/JUDICIAL

https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/40/pp.193-216.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/book/5431/chapter

https://gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/2216/2129

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/352429-judicial-

https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/

https://historical-cience.com/index.php/journal/article/

https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/234267/3/QadisMuftis.pdf

https://ijsshr.in/v5i12/Doc/45.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/book/5431/chapter/148289595

https://webofjournals.com/index.php/9/article/download/

https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/

https://www.academia.edu/372884/JUDICIALELECTIONSAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.